Recreational killing of wild animals can foster environmental stewardship – Nature.com

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Nature Sustainability (2024)
72 Accesses
63 Altmetric
Metrics details
Proposals to downsize the human population or protect large areas of the planet imply that biodiversity conservation is possible only when humans are excluded, but effective conservation action is shown by groups engaged in consumptive wildlife use. We demonstrate that recreational fishing and hunting can develop nature relationships that shape environmental stewardship. Sustainably catching, killing and eating wildlife is identified as a transformative sensory and emotionally charged experience that triggers environmental virtue and conservation. This outlook is less likely for hunting and fishing practices that disconnect users from the catch-and-kill experience or result in only superficial interactions with wildlife. However, excluding recreational wildlife use will probably jeopardize environmental stewardship.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Watson, J. E. et al. Protect the last of the wild. Nature 563, 27–30 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Crist, E. et al. Protecting half the planet and transforming human systems are complementary goals. Front. Conserv. Sci. 2, 761292 (2021).
Article  Google Scholar 
Cafaro, P., Hansson, P. & Götmark, F. Overpopulation is a major cause of biodiversity loss and smaller human populations are necessary to preserve what is left. Biol. Conserv. 272, 109646 (2022).
Article  Google Scholar 
EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing Nature Back into Our Lives Document 52020DC0380 (European Commission, 2020)
Estrada, A. et al. Global importance of Indigenous Peoples, their lands, and knowledge systems for saving the world’s primates from extinction. Sci. Adv. 8, 31 (2022).
Article  Google Scholar 
Reeder-Myers, L. et al. Indigenous oyster fisheries persisted for millennia and should inform future management. Nat. Commun. 13, 2383 (2022).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Granek, E. F. et al. Engaging recreational fishers in management and conservation: global case studies. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1125–1134 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Matern, S. et al. Fish community composition in small lakes: the impact of lake genesis and fisheries management. Freshw. Biol. 67, 2130–2147 (2022).
Article  Google Scholar 
Koning, A. A., Perales, K. M., Fluet-Chouinard, E. & McIntyre, P. B. A network of grassroots reserves protects tropical river fish diversity. Nature 588, 631–635 (2020).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Bandiaky-Badji, S. et al. Indigenous stewardship for habitat protection. One Earth 6, 68–72 (2023).
Article  Google Scholar 
Enqvist, J. P. et al. Stewardship as a boundary object for sustainability research: linking care, knowledge and agency. Landsc. Urban Plan. 179, 17–37 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Shephard, S., List, C. J. & Arlinghaus, R. Reviving the unique potential of recreational fishers as environmental stewards of aquatic ecosystems. Fish Fish. 24, 339–351 (2023).
Article  Google Scholar 
Ingold, T. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeol. 25, 152–174 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 
Stenseke, M. Connecting ‘relational values’ and relational landscape approaches. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 35, 82–88 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Di Minin, E. et al. Consequences of recreational hunting for biodiversity conservation and livelihoods. One Earth 4, 238–253 (2021).
Article  Google Scholar 
Arlinghaus, R., Schwab, A., Riepe, C. & Teel, T. A primer on anti-angling philosophy and its relevance for recreational fisheries in urbanized societies. Fisheries 37, 153–164 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 
List, C. J. Hunting, Fishing, and Environmental Virtue: Reconnecting Sportsmanship and Conservation (Oregon State Univ. Press, 2013)
Eden, S. & Bear, C. Models of equilibrium, natural agency and environmental change: lay ecologies in UK recreational angling. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 36, 393–407 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 
Peterson, M. N., Hansen, H. P., Peterson, M. J. & Peterson, T. R. How hunting strengthens social awareness of coupled human-natural systems. Wildl. Biol. Pract. 6, 127–143 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 
Kochalski, S., Riepe, C., Fujitani, M., Aas, Ø. & Arlinghaus, R. Public perception of river fish biodiversity in four European countries. Conserv. Biol. 33, 164–175 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 
Seekell, D. A. Recreational freshwater angler success is not significantly different from a random catch model. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 31, 203–208 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 
Monk, C. T. & Arlinghaus, R. Eurasian perch, Perca fluviatilis, spatial behaviour determines vulnerability independent of angler skill in a whole-lake reality mining experiment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 75, 417–428 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Klöckner, C. A. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—a meta-analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1028–1038 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 
Lachapelle, P. R. & McCool, S. F. Exploring the concept of ‘ownership’ in natural resource planning. Soc. Nat. Resour. 18, 279–285 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 
Arlinghaus, R. et al. Governing the recreational dimension of global fisheries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5209–5213 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Caniglia, G. et al. Practical wisdom and virtue ethics for knowledge co-production in sustainability science. Nat. Sustain. 6, 493–501 (2023).
Article  Google Scholar 
Carolan, M. Affective sustainable landscapes and care ecologies: getting a real feel for alternative food communities. Sustain. Sci. 10, 317–329 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 
Cooke, B., West, S. & Boonstra, W. J. Dwelling in the biosphere: exploring an embodied human–environment connection in resilience thinking. Sustain. Sci. 11, 831–843 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 
Stead, V. & Dominy, M. D. Moral horizons of land and place. Anthropol. Forum 28, 1–15 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Nyboer, E. A. et al. Overturning stereotypes: the fuzzy boundary between recreational and subsistence inland fisheries. Fish Fish. 23, 1282–1298 (2022).
Article  Google Scholar 
Cahoone, L. Hunting as a moral good. Environ. Values 18, 67–89 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 
Evans, J. C. With Respect for Nature: Living as Part of the Natural World (State Univ. New York Press, 2005).
von Essen, E. The impact of modernization on hunting ethics: emerging taboos among contemporary Swedish hunters. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 23, 21–38 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Landon, A. C., Kyle, G. T., van Riper, C. J., Schuett, M. A. & Park, J. Exploring the psychological dimensions of stewardship in recreational fisheries. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 38, 579–591 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Benningstad, N. C. & Kunst, J. R. Dissociating meat from its animal origins: a systematic literature review. Appetite 147, 104554 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Pachirat, T. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight (Yale Univ. Press, 2011).
McLoughlin, E. Knowing cows: transformative mobilizations of human and non‐human bodies in an emotionography of the slaughterhouse. Gend. Work Organ. 26, 322–342 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 
Marvin, G. in Killing Animals (ed. The Animal Studies Group) 10–29 (Univ. Illinois Press, 2006).
Gieser, T. in The Situationality of Human–Animal Relations: Perspectives from Anthropology and Philosophy (eds Breyer, T. & Widlok, T.) 129–142 (transcript publishing, 2018).
Kelly, J. R. & Rule, S. The hunt as love and kill: hunter–prey relations in the discourse of contemporary hunting magazines. Nat. Cult. 8, 185–204 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 
Donald, D. in Killing Animals (ed. The Animal Studies Group) 50–68 (Univ. Illinois Press, 2006).
Tantillo, J. A. Sport hunting, eudaimonia, and tragic wisdom. Philos. Contemp. World 8, 101–112 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 
Elmer, L. K. et al. Angling into the future: ten commandments for recreational fisheries science, management, and stewardship in a good Anthropocene. Environ. Manag. 60, 165–175 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Swan, J. In Defense of Hunting (Harper Collins, 1995).
Chizinski, C. J., Martin, D. R., Hurley, K. L. & Pope, K. L. Self-imposed length limits in recreational fisheries. Fish. Res. 155, 83–89 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 
Arlinghaus, R., Cooke, S. J., Schwab, A. & Cowx, I. G. Fish welfare: a challenge to the feelings‐based approach, with implications for recreational fishing. Fish Fish. 8, 57–71 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 
Aminpour, P. et al. Wisdom of stakeholder crowds in complex social–ecological systems. Nat. Sustain. 3, 191–199 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Bichel, N. & Hart, A. Trophy Hunting (Springer Nature, 2023).
Arlinghaus, R. et al. Understanding the complexity of catch-and-release in recreational fishing: an integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, ethical, social, and biological perspectives. Rev. Fish. Sci. 15, 75–167 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 
van Riper, C. J. et al. in Angler Recruitment, Retention, and Reactivation: The Future of Fisheries and Aquatic Conservation (eds Neal, J. W. et al.) Ch. 6 (American Fisheries Society, 2021).
Manni, A., Ottander, C. & Sporre, K. Young students’ aesthetic experiences and meaning-making processes in an outdoor environmental school practice. J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn. 17, 108–121 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
van Kleef, G. A. & Lelieveld, G. J. Moving the self and others to do good: the emotional underpinnings of prosocial behavior. Curr. Opin. Psych. 44, 80–88 (2022).
Article  Google Scholar 
Masterson, V. A., Enqvist, J. P., Stedman, R. C. & Tengö, M. Sense of place in social–ecological systems: from theory to empirics. Sustain. Sci. 14, 555–564 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 
Reis, A. C. More than the kill: hunters’ relationships with landscape and prey. Curr. Issues Tour. 12, 573–587 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 
Giraldo Herrera, C. E. Gutting fishy empathies off the Shetland Islands, Scotland. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 28, 1137–1158 (2022).
Article  Google Scholar 
Marvin, G. Sensing nature: encountering the world in hunting. Etnofoor 18, 15–26 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Bear, C. & Eden, S. Thinking like a fish? Engaging with nonhuman difference through recreational angling. Environ. Plan. D 29, 336–352 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 
Gieser, T. Into the meshwork of the forest: a sensory exploration of hunting landscapes in Germany. Rev. Andal. Antropol. 21, 124–147 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Gottwald, S. & Stedman, R. C. Preserving one’s meaningful place or not? Understanding environmental stewardship behaviour in river landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 198, 103778 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Larson, L. R., Cooper, C. B., Stedman, R. C., Decker, D. J. & Gagnon, R. J. Place-based pathways to pro-environmental behavior: empirical evidence for a conservation–recreation model. Soc. Natur. Resour. 31, 871–891 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Bell, J. in A Fairytale in Question: Historical Interactions between Humans and Wolves (eds Masius, P. & Sprenger, J.) 282–303 (White Horse Press, 2015).
Marvin, G. A passionate pursuit: foxhunting as performance. Sociol. Rev. 51, 46–60 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 
von Essen, E., Allen, M. & Hansen, H. P. Hunters, crown, nobles, and conservation elites: class antagonism over the ownership of common fauna. Int. J. Cult. Prop. 24, 161–186 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Loveridge, A. J., Reynolds, J. C. & Milner-Gulland, E. Does sport hunting benefit conservation. Key Top. Conserv. Biol. 1, 238 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Schill, D. J. & Scarpella, R. L. Barbed hook restrictions in catch-and-release trout fisheries: a social issue. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 17, 873–881 (1997).
Article  Google Scholar 
Bate, R. Saving our streams: the role of the Anglers’ Conservation Association in protecting English and Welsh rivers. Fordham Environ. Law Rev. 14, 375–413 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Kirchhofer, A. in Conservation of Freshwater Fishes: Options for the Future (eds Collares-Pereira, M. J. et al.) 389–401 (Fishing News Books, 2002).
Oldfield, T. E., Smith, R. J., Harrop, S. R. & Leader-Williams, N. Field sports and conservation in the United Kingdom. Nature 423, 531–533 (2003).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Tufts, B. L., Holden, J. & DeMille, M. Benefits arising from sustainable use of North America’s fishery resources: economic and conservation impacts of recreational angling. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 72, 850–868 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Rippa, A. Hunting, rewilding, and multispecies entanglements in the Alps. Ethnos 88, 949–971 (2023).
Article  Google Scholar 
Nikolaus, R. et al. Influence of protected riparian areas on habitat structure and biodiversity in and at small lakes managed by recreational fisheries. Fish. Res. 256, 106476 (2022).
Article  Google Scholar 
Tickle, L. & von Essen, E. The seven sins of hunting tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 84, 102996 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Causey, A. S. On the morality of hunting. Environ. Ethics 11, 327–343 (1989).
Article  Google Scholar 
Clark, J. L. Uncharismatic invasives. Environ. Humanit. 6, 29–52 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 
Emond, P., Breda, C. & Denayer, D. Doing the “dirty work”: how hunters were enlisted in sanitary rituals and wild boars’ destruction to fight Belgium’s ASF (African Swine Fever) outbreak. Anthropozoologica 56, 87–104 (2021).
Article  Google Scholar 
Gieser, T. The experience of ‘being a hunter’. Hunter Gatherer Res. 3, 227–251 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
von Essen, E. & Allen, M. Killing with kindness: when hunters want to let you know they care. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 26, 179–195 (2021).
Article  Google Scholar 
Turnbull, J. et al. Digital ecologies: materialities, encounters, governance. Prog. Environ. Geogr. 2, 3–32 (2022).
Article  Google Scholar 
Swan, J. Peaceful arms: hunting and sport shooting. Tex. Rev. Law Polit. 212, 189–212 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Mitchell, A. Tracing Wolves: Materiality, Effect and Difference. PhD thesis, Stockholm Univ. (2018).
Gieser, T. in Managing the Return of the Wild: Human Encounters with Wolves in Europe (eds Fenske, M. & Tschofen, B.) 164–179 (Routledge, 2020).
Øian, H. & Skogen, K. Property and possession: hunting tourism and the morality of landownership in rural Norway. Soc. Nat. Resour. 29, 104–118 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 
Ireland, L. Canning canned hunts: using state and federal legislation to eliminate the unethical practice of canned “hunting”. Anim. Law Rev. 8, 223–242 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Nelson, M. P., Bruskotter, J. T., Vucetich, J. A. & Chapron, G. Emotions and the ethics of consequence in conservation decisions: lessons from Cecil the lion. Conserv. Lett. 9, 302–306 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 
Download references
E.v.E. wrote this article under funding from the Swedish Research Council (Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas), grant number Formas Dnr 2019-01168. T.G. received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 866350). All images are original artwork created for this article by J. Miller.
Department of Biology, Ave Maria University, Ave Maria, FL, USA
Samuel Shephard
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Erica von Essen
Department of Ecological Anthropology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia
Thorsten Gieser
SUNY Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY, USA
Charles J. List
Department of Fish Biology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology, Berlin, Germany
Robert Arlinghaus
Inland Fisheries & Division of Integrative Fisheries Management, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Robert Arlinghaus
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
S.S. conceived the original question, which was developed through conversation with E.v.E., T.G., C.J.L. and R.A. The first draft was written by S.S.; E.v.E., T.G., C.J.L. and R.A. provided ongoing advice on the article structure and refinements to visualizations, and helped to re-write all subsequent drafts. All authors agreed on the final version of the paper.
Correspondence to Samuel Shephard or Erica von Essen.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Nature Sustainability thanks Jessica Rizzolo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Shephard, S., von Essen, E., Gieser, T. et al. Recreational killing of wild animals can foster environmental stewardship. Nat Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01379-7
Download citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01379-7
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Advertisement
Nature Sustainability (Nat Sustain) ISSN 2398-9629 (online)
© 2024 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

source