Climate Change to Cause $38 Trillion a Year in Damages by 2049 – Insurance Journal

Climate change will inflict losses to the global economy worth an annual $38 trillion by 2049, as extreme weather ravages agricultural yields, harms labor productivity and destroys infrastructure, according to researchers at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).
Planetary warming will result in an income reduction of 19% globally by mid-century, compared to a global economy without climate change, according to research published in Nature on Wednesday. The paper uses data from more than 1,600 regions worldwide over the past 40 years to assess future impacts of a warmer planet on economic growth.
“Climate change will cause massive economic damages within the next 25 years in almost all countries,” Leonie Wenz, the scientist at PIK who led the study, said in a statement. “We have to cut down our emissions drastically and immediately – if not, economic losses will become even bigger in the second half of the century, amounting to up to 60% on global average by 2100.”
Human-made greenhouse gas emissions have warmed the world about 1.1C on average since pre-industrial times, leading to extreme weather events that cost about $7 trillion over the past 30 years, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. Climate damages keep rising, averaging $500 billion a year — or 2% of the US GDP — since 2016. Developing nations that contributed less to global warming are bearing the brunt of losses and damages.
The researchers said cutting emissions and limiting global warming to 2C by the end of the century would be the most cost effective way to reduce further climate damages. “Protecting our climate is much cheaper than not doing so, and that is without even considering non-economic impacts such as loss of life or biodiversity,” Wenz said. “We will need more adaptation efforts if we want to avoid at least some of them.”
Countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer an income loss 60% greater than the higher-income countries, and 40% greater than higher-emission countries, according to the report. They also have the least resources to adapt to current impacts.
But the economic losses of the warming will be felt everywhere and “also in highly developed ones such as Germany, France and the United States,” Wenz said. Only regions at very high latitudes will benefit from hotter temperatures.
The magnitude of the economic damages exceeds previous estimates because it takes into account not just temperature increases, but also additional climate variables like extreme rainfall and impacts of extreme weather events on agriculture and labor productivity, as well as human health.
“Structural change towards a renewable energy system is needed for our security and will save us money,” said Anders Levermann, a co-author of the study. “Staying on the path we are currently on will lead to catastrophic consequences.”
Photograph: A child inspects a large-scale projection of planet earth at the Museum of Natural Sciences of Barcelona, a designated climatic refuge, part of Barcelona’s Climate Shelter Network, where residents can take shelter during extreme heat.
Topics Trends Climate Change
Was this article valuable?
Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.
Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Get automatic alerts for this topic.
“Climate change will cause massive economic damages within the next 25 years in almost all countries,” Leonie Wenz, the scientist at PIK who led the study, said in a statement. “We have to cut down our emissions drastically and immediately – if not, economic losses will become even bigger in the second half of the century, amounting to up to 60% on global average by 2100.”
I agree with Leonie! … Cutting down emissions will be the cause of those economic (and health) damages!
CO2 is needed by plants to create Oxygen needed by animals.
And there’s nothing man can do to stop Climate Change.
PS I wondered how the subject source got their acronym ‘PIK’ from Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. (The picture of the guy in the unrelated ad for the Academy of Insurance seminar, scratching his head, is perfectly placed!) Then, it hit me; they did what they always do with the raw data; “pick & choose”.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
*
*




source