Sustainability requirements include a demand for delivery, not just data – Wolters Kluwer

About Wolters Kluwer
Wolters Kluwer is a global provider of professional information, software solutions, and services for clinicians, nurses, accountants, lawyers, and tax, finance, audit, risk, compliance, and regulatory sectors.
Select Language
Health
Trusted clinical technology and evidence-based solutions that drive effective decision-making and outcomes across healthcare. Specialized in clinical effectiveness, learning, research and safety.
Tax & Accounting
Enabling tax and accounting professionals and businesses of all sizes drive productivity, navigate change, and deliver better outcomes. With workflows optimized by technology and guided by deep domain expertise, we help organizations grow, manage, and protect their businesses and their client’s businesses.
ESG
Offering comprehensive tools and expert guidance to companies to help meet regulatory requirements to support sustainability efforts and manage ESG risks efficiently.
Finance
Our solutions for regulated financial departments and institutions help customers meet their obligations to external regulators. We specialize in unifying and optimizing processes to deliver a real-time and accurate view of your financial position.
Compliance
Enabling organizations to ensure adherence with ever-changing regulatory obligations, manage risk, increase efficiency, and produce better business outcomes.
Legal
Serving legal professionals in law firms, General Counsel offices and corporate legal departments with data-driven decision-making tools. We streamline legal and regulatory research, analysis, and workflows to drive value to organizations, ensuring more transparent, just and safe societies.
When it comes to sustainability, there are many issues companies need to keep in mind. The list can be daunting. But many items are inter-relatable.
An Economist Impact article, Top Sustainability Trends for 2024, cites climate disclosure, reporting a company’s impact on nature, and the need for identifying effective adaption plans as the top three concerns.
In the United States, final rules released by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) outline disclosure requirements for material climate-related information in registration statements and annual reports.
In Europe, companies need to follow the European Union’s requirements outlined in the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), as well as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).
The CSRD requires large institutions that have issued securities trading on a regular market to disclose ESG risk information. The Directive also requires investment firms to look at the introduction of an ESG risk dimension in the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process “by competent authorities.”
While data is important, there is also an increased call for delivery — concrete actions by companies that will curtail climate disasters.
Peter Bakker, president of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), is concerned companies may be paying too much attention to dotting their I’s and crossing the T’s. Bakker cautions, “Businesses must ensure that they do not report for the sake of it, but use reporting to aid better decision-making and bring about actual change.”
He believes that instead of reporting, companies should be rewarded for progress. “Aligning changing business needs with capital-allocation models used by the financial markets will boost the speed of the transition, which is currently nowhere near sufficient,” he says.
Mark Lee, Partner and Director at ERM, a sustainability consultancy, agrees that there needs to be more focus on accountability and change, rather than just reporting. He says in the Economist Impact article, “We’ve got much better at broadcasting what we’re doing, but without changing much – emissions continue to rise, deforestation is accelerating,” he says.
Another type of disclosure growing in importance is the impact a company has on nature and vice-versa.
Last fall, the Task Force for Nature-Related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) released its final recommendations explaining how companies should assess, disclose, and manage nature-related risks and impacts.
At the core are four principles that align with TCFD and incorporate the ISSB’s IFRS-S1 General Requirements:
This type of reporting will demand an increasingly larger focus as the world heads to the UN nature talks at COP16 in Colombia this October.
However, reporting requirements still are not clear. In the Economic Impact article, Mr. Bakker of the WBCSD says that many companies struggle with what being “nature positive” means. There will be a lot of work to better understand this in 2024, Bakker predicts.
Because of the increasing number of weather-related disasters in 2023, as well as it being declared the hottest year ever recorded, many expect investors to ask, and companies to deliver on their efforts to adapt to climate change.
Supply chain resilience is front and center, especially regarding flood protection and maintaining access to water for supply chains.
According to Tom Beagent, a partner in PwC’s sustainability services, companies have their work cut out for them. Many may need to build up their capacity and skill set to deal with future challenges. “None of this is going to be easy,” he says in the Economist Impact article, “but then we’re talking about some quite significant challenges that need to be overcome.”
In conclusion, as pressure from regulators and stakeholders on ESG and sustainability disclosure ramps up, companies should be aware that pressure for also more action may not be far behind.
Ready to get started?
Talk to one of our experts.
Check out these resources
When you have to be right
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.

source