Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
Innovation to create sustainable beauty and fashion products and their packaging can be costly. But it’s not the wealthiest consumers that are the most interested in spending for eco-friendly practices, according to a new study by venture studio and brand incubator Squared Circles. The company has invested in brands like Nutrafol, which sold to Unilever, and $135-sweatshirt brand Pangaia.
The new research report, out on April 22, finds that over half of its 3,000 survey respondents are willing to make lifestyle changes to support sustainability. Sixty-four percent of those surveyed said they “recognise the need to compromise the way we live to ensure sustainability.” But that number drops when it comes to paying higher prices for sustainable products and practices, especially among consumers in a higher income bracket.
Among the surveyed group, 52 percent would be willing to pay 10 percent more for a sustainable product. But when taking out responses by anyone with a household income below at least $100,000, that percentage drops to less than half at 45 percent.
“The more wealthy this consumer is, the more they scrutinise, interestingly enough, how they spend their hard-earned money,” said Lukas Derksen, co-founder of Squared Circles.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gen X respondents were especially wary of sustainable products. Dividing its respondents into four psychographic groups, “Conscious Maximalists,” “Passive Activists,” “Checked Out” and “Modest Means,” the Gen X-dominant “Conscious Maximalist” segment was 27 percent more likely than average to strongly agree with the statement, “sustainable products don’t live up to the hype.”
However, the youngest segment of surveyed consumers was more willing to spend on sustainability than all age groups surveyed. Among the mainly 18-to-45-year-old “Passive Activists” profile, 76 percent believe that a company should be able to charge 10 percent more for a sustainable product, and 70 percent are willing to buy it. The rates for those making more and less than $100,000 were similar for this group, and 74 percent overall agreed that we must compromise our lifestyle for sustainability.
But one area of sustainability where most consumers said they are not willing to sacrifice is quality. Only 35 percent said they would be willing to buy a product with lower performance if it was more sustainable.
Learn more:
Don’t Believe What Consumers Say When It Comes to Sustainability
A growing body of consumer surveys suggests interest in sustainable consumption is reaching a tipping point. Those surveys are deeply flawed, writes Kenneth P. Pucker.
Editor’s note: An update on Apr. 22, 2024 changed “venture capital firm” to “venture studio.”
Liz Flora is a Beauty Correspondent at Business of Fashion. She is based in Los Angeles and covers beauty and wellness.
© 2024 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions
Fashion’s biggest sustainable cotton certifier said it found no evidence of non-compliance at farms covered by its standard, but acknowledged weaknesses in its monitoring approach.
As they move to protect their intellectual property, big brands are coming into conflict with a growing class of up-and-coming designers working with refashioned designer gear.
The industry needs to ditch its reliance on fossil-fuel-based materials like polyester in order to meet climate targets, according to a new report from Textile Exchange.
Cotton linked to environmental and human rights abuses in Brazil is leaking into the supply chains of major fashion brands, a new investigation has found, prompting Zara-owner Inditex to send a scathing rebuke to the industry’s biggest sustainable cotton certifier.
The essential daily round-up of fashion news, analysis, and breaking news alerts.
Our newsletters may include 3rd-party advertising, by subscribing you agree to the Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.